PLS 131 – Brazil’s Politics
Politics of Brazil
I. Basic themes found in discussions of
Brazilian politics
a. Portuguese cultural identity, but mixed
b. Early Monarchy replaced by history of unstable Republican governments
c. Military role in politics
d.
Strong
state role – from state corporatism to bureaucratic authoritarianism
e.
Geographic
insertion at the heart of South America
f.
Abundant
natural resources – unrealized potential
II. Identity
crisis overcome
a. Portugal claims Brazil
1.
Pedro Álvares
Cabral claims Brazil for Portugal in April 1500, followed by Portuguese
colonization
2.
Early
economic development includes land grants to aristocrats, slavery
3.
Portugal
benefits from sugar economy in Brazil, but incurs high cost in fending off other
European powers
4. Portuguese royal family escapes Napoleon early 1800s, moves to Brazil, returns to Portugal after Napoleon's defeat
5.
Dom Pedro
(son of Portuguese king), faced with being only the appointed governor of
Brazil (rather than King of something), declares independence 9-7-1822
6.
After
struggle with Portugal, independence achieved 8-29-1825
7. Dom Pedro abdicates as Emperor to son Dom Pedro II, 1831 - due to financial crisis; Pedro II becomes emperor in 1840
8.
Slavery
of indigenous people abolished 1831, general end 1888
10.
Emperor – served as “moderating power” between parties and
interests
a.
This
period served to establish a “constitutional monarchy” with elections,
alteration of parties in power, rule of law
11.
Military coup, Republic declared in 1889 – decline of
sugar/slaves -
rise of coffee and urban/commercial class
not dependent on
slavery
12.
1891 1st
direct election for President
13.
Various revolts follow – federalist, populist – see
Legitimacy issues below
b.
Modern Identity issues:
a.
Role of religion
– secular/Catholic/some more recent Protestant (evangelical)
b.
Role
of immigrants – assimilation based on shared values, variety of ethnic
and national origins (Europeans, Asians, Africans, Indians)
c.
Role of class
conflicts – strong populist tradition, more modern class structure
emerging, overtakes rural oligarch/small-holder/farm worker cleavage, but large
income inequalities (see figure 1 below) with 28% of the population living on
less than $1 a day and significant percentages of urban residents living in
favelas, overlapping with urban/rural and race distinctions continue to orient
modern politics.
d.
Western hemisphere – dominant country within South America, but not yet defined place
vis-à-vis North America, NAFTA – Free Trade Area of the Americas vs. Mercosur
(created by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay in March 1991 with the goal
of creating a common market).
e.
Economic dependency - Strong presence of multi-national corporations competes/collaborates
with local private sector, causes some nationalist resentment
III. Legitimacy
Crisis – product of partial modernization, corporatist tendencies, military
intervention, populism, federalism
a.
Legitimacy Crises expressed in great variety of regime types:
b.
Monarchy since 1822
c.
Empire
d.
Republics since 1889
i.
First
republican constitution – United States of Brazil, strongly liberal and
federal – modeled on US example
1.
Repel
invasions through control of military/foreign affairs, maintain Republican form
of regime, establish order at request of states, assure execution of federal
laws, foreign trade/customs, imposition of a variety of taxes, issuance of
money, separation of church and state
2.
Bicameral
legislature (House of Deputies, Federal Senate)
3.
Separation
of powers (no member of legislature part of executive)
4.
President
of the Republic elected with Vice President (but no electoral college), has
commander in chief function, etc.
5.
Supreme
Court
6. Electorate – at least 21, male, excludes illiterates (that’s most people), those within religious establishments not able to observe a free vote
2.
State governments – various taxing abilities (except on interstate commerce),
2.
Dominated
by decentralization and power of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais
e.
1930 Revolution - Vargas takes power in midst of economic crisis, develops more
centralized rule
i.
Undermines liberal concepts of civil society/state
ii.
State inspired industrialization – establishes public firms
iii.
State corporatism
1. State sponsored associations for employers and employees (representational monopoly)
2. State arbitrates conflicts
iv. Estado Novo – new title for state corporatism
1. Diminished role for representative, elected institutions
2. Expanded welfare state
3. Expanded professionalization, funding of military, public ownership of firms critical to national security
f. 1945-1964 Populist Republic
i. New elections brought about new conflicts
1. Those favoring clientelism and social control through a strong state (Social Democrats)
2. Those favoring continued but leftist state corporatism (Brazilian Labor Party)
3. Those favoring liberal Republicanism and rejection of all corporatism except for economic development (Democratic Union Party)
4. Populist outcome
1. PSD victory ensures social control in exchange for defined benefits to guarantee support (more welfare, labor favors)
2. Kubitschek follows Vargas – Brazil enjoys strong economy until 1960, corruption decline thereafter
3. Early 1960s, period of growing mobilization of social forces, ideological conflict, partisanship – inability to adjust political institutions
g. 1964-1985 Military government – bureaucratic authoritarianism – modernizing regime coupling military elites with technocrats in pursuit of order and economic development
1. New party system erected by military (ARENA and MDB) reorders old party followers into new organizations
2. Congress – easily circumvented by executive with strong power of using decrees
3. Expansion of state sector leads to economic growth until 1973
4. Economic troubles lead to abertura and growth of opposition MDB – regaining of liberal institutions/liberties
5. 1984 – new Presidential elections, 1987 Constituent Assembly redrafts constitution
h. 1988-present – Return to Democracy –
i. 1988 constitution which takes hold in 1988
1. More decentralization
2. More worker rights
3. Independence of trade unions
4. Retention of some public firms, exclusion of sectors from foreign investment and privatization
Article
170: “The economic order, founded on the appreciation of the value of
human work and on free enterprise, is intended to ensure everyone a life with
dignity, in accordance with the dictates of social justice, with due regard for
the following principles
I.
national
sovereignty;
II.
private
property;
III.
the
social function of property;
IV.
free
competition;
V.
consumer
protection;
VI.
environment
protection;
VII.
reduction
of regional and social differences;
VIII.
pursuit
of full employment;
IX. "preferential treatment for small enterprises organized under Brazilian laws and having their head-office and management in Brazil.”
ii. 1989 – First direct election of President – Fernando Collor de Mello
1. Starts reverse of statism – privatization, economic deregulation, open to external world – a Latin “Thatcher?”
2. But inflation problem not solved, President impeached in 1992
3. Replaced by I. Franco who with Fernando Cardoso implements “Real Plan” which curbs inflation
4. Cardoso then wins Presidency in 1994 and 1998
5. Rising state debt led to financial crisis
6.
Lula da
Silva – Left wing populist elected in 2002
(more later)
IV. Penetration
Crisis - State building and economic development
a. Industrialization
1. Export vs. import-substitution economic development
a. Export
i. First based on agricultural exports
1. coffee, sugar, cotton, rubber
2. Through the early 1920s – brought in $ for infrastructure development, spin off industries
3. 1930s – Depression causes decline in foreign markets – less foreign currency for purchase imports
a. Import-substitution results
i. Phases, early focuses on low tech industries, sectors received some state subsidies, tariff protection
b.
1950s –
move to more complex industries through state planning
i. National development bank
ii. National public firms
1. subsidized prices in private sector
2. lower credit costs made private firms more internationally competitive
3. Planned benefits to targeted sectors sounds like French indicative planning
c. 1960s and 1980s – Contradictions of ISI emerge
i. Protectionism – creates noncompetitive firms dependent on artificial subsidies
ii. Cost of imported inputs covered by overvalued currency, which undermines exports
iii. Lack of foreign currency prompts govt. to overload the money supply resulting in inflation
iv. 1970s – growth in foreign debt; foreign capital becomes more important
v. Military govt. tries to cope by emphasizing efficiencies in agriculture for export
vi. Environmental problems – cost of growth emphasis, weak regulatory impulse
1.
Water and
air pollution
2.
Toxins in
ground
3.
Deforestation
due to mining, cattle, timber, slash and burn agriculture
4.
Efforts
to deal with these problems start under military, expanded after 1985
5. However, results have not been impressive
vii. Fiscal problems
1. Tax avoidance is chronic
2. Regressive tax policies
3. informal economy stays outside taxable transactions (up to ½ of GDP)
4. Local governments badly affected by excessive spending and lack oversight by fed govt.
5. Cardoso tried to reign in state govts. but led to serious intergovernmental conflict
6. Inflation – chronic problem
1.
Cardoso
tried anchoring currency to US dollar
2.
Improved
tax collection
3.
more
foreign investment
4.
more
stimulus to exports
5.
but excessive spending by govt. causes currency to
devalue and inflation fears to continue
2. Current economic situation – Brazil’s “Third Way?”
i. Lula da Silva – elected in October 2002
1. Places great emphasis on overcoming social problems – poverty, hunger, joblessness
2. Committed to free trade, foreign investment
3. Committed to previous contracts
4. Committed to fighting inflation
5.
What will
he do that is different than predescessors?
i.
b.
Principal trading partners (1998):
exports to US (17.8%), Argentina (13.2%), Netherlands (5.4%), Japan (4.3%),
Germany (5.9%), UK (2.1%). [EU (27%)]
c.
Principal trading partners (1998):
imports from US (22.2%), Argentina (13.2%), Germany (8.6%), Japan (5.3%), Italy
(5.2%), [EU (26.7%)]
GDP per sector (1996): industry 39.3%, agriculture 12%, financial
services 7%, mining 1%
Economic
growth (1998): 0.2% (1993: 4.9%, 1994: 5.9%, 1995: 4.2%, 1996: 2.8%, 1997:
3.2%)
V. Distribution Crisis – Brazil’s welfare state
A. Ineffective welfare state
a.
High
cost, but insufficient coverage
b.
Only 15%
of workers are eligible for most social benefits, those in the informal sectors
are excluded
c.
Many
don’t contribute taxes to welfare system
d.
Many
retirees reduce revenues
e.
Public
sector workers are disproportionately benefited
f.
Federal
govt. decentralizing social services to states resulting in disparate outcomes
B. Lingering problems
1.
High
unemployment
2.
Inequalities – highly skewed income distribution
– Brazil at “60” vs. Latin America average of 50.
Figure
2: Income
Tables (source: World Bank)
3.
Corruption
– makes it hard to effectively administer services and programs
4.
Rural
land tenure with high concentration of land ownership
5.
Rural to
urban migration without adequate housing or employment
6.
Regional
inequalities
7.
Very high
cost of maintaining “universal” access to welfare benefits
1.
Reforms
strongly resisted – element of continuing instability
C. Questions – has Brazil found its “Third Way?”
a.
Cardoso
(first as Minister of Finance and then as President) had started with a
“Thatcher” like series of reforms: free market reforms, privatization,
reduced govt. spending (austerity), more efficient tax collection, a more stable
currency.
b.
Lula da
Silva (like Blair) promises to retain and deepen these initiatives, but also
focus on improving the lot of the poor.
Brazil Part 2 - Political Institutions
Main Institutions
President - head of state, head of government,
commander-in-chief
Directly elected in two round election (primary,
general), four year terms, 2 term maximum
President is focus of policy making. Executive bureaucracy takes major role in setting forth major policies, based on leadership both of President as well as other central usually economic Ministers and Directors. President appoints 100s of senior government officials. Has a "Government Council" (Cabinet) run by chief of staff.
Some important institutions within executive branch that affect economic policy making include the Finance Ministry, Central Bank, the Department of Planning, and the BNDES (development bank) Legislature is left to work on the details.
Civil Service - runs under the executive branch. Professionalized but tends to have clientelist characteristics as well - with individual stakeholders included in policy-making and specific concessions made in exchange for political support. These are called bureaucratic rings. These rings sometimes involve organized interest groups such as business associations or trade unions, but often are personalistic and relate to specific individuals. Note that the election of Lula da Silva and the rise of the Workers' Party, which has strong ties to the trade union movement (CUT) may change the historical pattern of interest group/executive branch interaction.Military - now more professionalized, less political focus. Has seen reductions in budget, privatization of military owned "industrial-defense" firms.
Police - split into "civil" (investigatory) and "military" which is more concerned with daily law and order. Known for violence and being hard to control.
Legislature - two chambers: Chamber of Deputies (513, based on population) and Senate (81,based on territory - 26 States plus "Federal District")
Justice - led by Supreme Federal Court - which has limited constitutional oversight duties as well as being the final court of appeal. 11 Justices appointed by President with affirmation of Senate. Lifetime appointment. Court has often lacked assertiveness as a "check and balance" typically allowing the Executive to get away with marginal calls.
State/Local courts known to be influenced by local power structures, particularly in rural areas where landowners are still dominant social force.
Federalism - States led by elected governors (4 year terms, 2 term maximum)
Since 1980s, increasing decentralization, with greater local taxing authority. State banks have financed local projects, but have run up big debts, usually passed on to the federal level. President Collor cut back on this. He also increased requirements for local funding of education, social services and projects.
Representation
60% of population able to vote by 1994 (still excludes illiterates). Minimum voting age: 16. Voting compulsory starting at age 18.
Chamber of Deputies
4 year terms
Proportional representation within each state: min. 8 deputies, maximum 70. No term limits, high turnover. Overrepresents rural areas.
Senate
3 from each state+federal district. 8 year terms. 2/3 elected one cycle, 1/3 elected next cycle. No term limits, but lots of turnover.
Bill passage
Legislation has to pass both houses. President can sign or reject in whole or in part. Legislature can override President by majority vote of joint session.
Senate can impeach President and affirm appointments.
Each chamber has a committee structure, 16 committees.
Party System
Parties historical weak, low party discipline, without durable party labels/organizations. Personal loyalities and patronage/career advancement have been more important. Reinforced by proportional representation and tendency of President to offer specific "pork" to individual legislators as price of bill passage.
Basic ideological tendencies:
Right: PFL (and smaller parties) neo-liberal - wants smaller government, privatization, liberal trade policy (except for some protectionism), wants reduction in "social rights" and end to proportional representation.
Center - PMDB, PSDB - mostly interested in economic stabilization, deficit reduction, low inflation, steady growth. Mixed economy with some welfare state.
Left - PT (plus lots of smaller left parties) - want more government support to domestic industry, increase in "social rights," less inequality and more help to working classes.
Chart of 1999, 2002 Elections - Chamber of Deputies Results
2002 Presidential Election Second Round Results |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Candidates | Votes | % 1st round | Votes | % 2nd round |
---|---|---|---|---|
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT, PC do B, PRB, PL, PSB, PP) | 46,662,365 | 48.61 | 58,295,042 | 60.83 |
Geraldo Alckmin (PSDB, PFL, PPS) | 39,968,369 | 41.64 | 37,543,178 | 39.17 |
Heloísa Helena (P-SOL, PSTU, PCB) | 6,575,393 | 6.85 | - | - |
Cristovam Buarque (PDT) | 2,538,844 | 2.64 | - | - |
Ana Maria Rangel (PRP) | 126,404 | 0.13 | - | - |
José Maria Eymael (PSDC) | 63,294 | 0.07 | - | - |
Luciano Bivar (PSL) | 62,064 | 0.06 | - | - |
Total (turnout 83.2 and ) | 95,996,733 | 100.00 | 95,838,220 | 100.00 |
Notes: party of the candidate, supporting parties, unofficial supporting parties | ||||
Source: Justiça Eleitoral |
Parties | Chamber of Deputies | Federal Senate | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | Seats | Votes | % | Total seats | elected in 2006 | |
Workers' Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores) | 13,989,859 | 15.0 | 83 | 16,222,159 | 19.2 | 11 | 2 |
Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro) | 13,580,517 | 14.6 | 89 | 10,148,024 | 12.0 | 15 | 4 |
Brazilian Social Democracy Party (Partido da Social-Democracia Brasileira) | 12,691,043 | 13.6 | 65 | 10,547,778 | 12.5 | 15 | 5 |
Liberal Front Party (Partido da Frente Liberal) | 10,182,308 | 10.9 | 65 | 21,653,812 | 25.7 | 18 | 6 |
Progressive Party (Partido Progresista) | 6,662,309 | 7.1 | 42 | 4,228,431 | 5.0 | 1 | 1 |
Brazilian Socialist Party (Partido Socialista Brasileiro) | 5,732,464 | 6.2 | 27 | 2,143,355 | 2.5 | 3 | 1 |
Democratic Labour Party (Partido Democrático Trabalhista) | 4,854,017 | 5.2 | 24 | 5,023,041 | 6.0 | 5 | 1 |
Brazilian Labour Party (Partido Trabalhista Brasileiro) | 4,397,743 | 4.7 | 22 | 2,676,469 | 3.2 | 4 | 3 |
Liberal Party (Partido Liberal) | 4,074,618 | 4.4 | 23 | 696,501 | 0.8 | 3 | 1 |
Socialist People's Party (Partido Popular Socialista) | 3,630,462 | 3.9 | 21 | 1,232,571 | 1.5 | 1 | 1 |
Green Party (Partido Verde) | 3,368,561 | 3.6 | 13 | 1,425,765 | 1.7 | 0 | 0 |
Communist Party of Brazil (Partido Comunista do Brasil) | 1,982,323 | 2.1 | 13 | 6,364,019 | 7.5 | 2 | 1 |
Christian Social Party (Partido Social Cristão) | 1,747,863 | 1.9 | 9 | 131,548 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
Socialism and Freedom Party (Partido Socialismo e Libertade) | 1,149,619 | 1.2 | 3 | 351,527 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Party of the Reconstruction of the National Order (Partido de Reedificação da Ordem Nacional) | 907,494 | 1.0 | 2 | 69,640 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
Party of National Mobilization (Partido da Mobilização Nacional) | 875,686 | 0.9 | 3 | 12,925 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Christian Labour Party (Partido Trabalhista Cristão) | 806,662 | 0.9 | 4 | 39,690 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Humanist Party of Solidarity (Partido Humanista da Solidariedade) | 435,328 | 0.5 | 2 | 24,940 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Christian Social Democratic Party (Partido Social Democrata Cristão) | 354,217 | 0.4 | 0 | 53,025 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
Labour Party of Brazil (Partido Trabalhista do Brasil) | 311,833 | 0.3 | 1 | 69,923 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
Party of the Nation's Retirees (Partido dos Aposentados da Nação) | 264,682 | 0.3 | 1 | 2,969 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Brazilian Republican Party (Partido Republicano Brasileiro) | 244,059 | 0.3 | 1 | 264,155 | 0.3 | 2 | 0 |
Republican Progressive Party (Partido Republicano Progresista) | 233,497 | 0.3 | 0 | 12,954 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Social Liberal Party (Partido Social Liberal) | 190,793 | 0.2 | 0 | 46,542 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Brazilian Labour Renewal Party (Partido Renovador Trabalhista Brasileiro) | 171,908 | 0.2 | 0 | 644,111 | 0.8 | 1 | 1 |
National Labour Party (Partido Trabalhista) | 149,809 | 0.2 | 0 | 11,063 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
United Socialist Workers' Party (Partido Socialista dos Trabalhadores Unificado) | 101,307 | 0.1 | 0 | 196,636 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
Brazilian Communist Party (Partido Comunista Brasileiro) | 64,766 | 0.1 | 0 | 62,756 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 |
Workers Cause Party (Partido da Causa Operária) | 29,083 | 0.0 | 0 | 27,476 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Total (turnout 83.3) | 93,184,830 | 100 | 513 | 84,383,805 | 100 | 81 | 27 |
Parties |
Essential Links: |
Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira
(PSDB)
Economic Review of Brazil
Partido da Frente Liberal (PFL)
Partido do
Movimento Democrático Brasileiro (PMDB) |