PLS 131 – Brazil’s Politics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Politics of Brazil

I. Basic themes found in discussions of Brazilian politics

    a. Portuguese cultural identity, but mixed

    b. Early Monarchy replaced by history of unstable Republican governments

c.     Military role in politics

d.     Strong state role – from state corporatism to bureaucratic authoritarianism

e.      Geographic insertion at the heart of South America

f.       Abundant natural resources – unrealized potential

II. Identity crisis overcome

    a. Portugal claims Brazil

1.     Pedro Álvares Cabral claims Brazil for Portugal in April 1500, followed by Portuguese colonization

2.     Early economic development includes land grants to aristocrats, slavery

3.     Portugal benefits from sugar economy in Brazil, but incurs high cost in fending off other European powers

4.     Portuguese royal family escapes Napoleon early 1800s, moves to Brazil, returns to Portugal after Napoleon's defeat

5.     Dom Pedro (son of Portuguese king), faced with being only the appointed governor of Brazil (rather than King of something), declares independence 9-7-1822

6.     After struggle with Portugal, independence achieved 8-29-1825

7.     Dom Pedro abdicates as Emperor to son Dom Pedro II, 1831 - due to financial crisis; Pedro II becomes emperor in 1840

8.     Slavery of indigenous people abolished 1831, general end 1888

10.  Emperor – served as “moderating power” between parties and interests

a.      This period served to establish a “constitutional monarchy” with elections, alteration of parties in power, rule of law overseen by the Emperor

11.   Military coup, Republic declared in 1889 – decline of sugar/slaves - rise of coffee and urban/commercial class not dependent on slavery who did not like centralized rule and wanted federalism (a demand supported by the Republicans and opposed by Monarchists)–

12. 1891 1st direct election for President

13.  Various revolts follow – federalist, populist – see Legitimacy issues below

b.     Modern Identity issues:

a.      Role of religion – secular/Catholic/some more recent Protestant (evangelical)

b.      Role of immigrants – assimilation based on shared values, variety of ethnic and national origins (Europeans, Asians, Africans, Indians)

c.     Role of class conflicts – strong populist tradition, more modern class structure emerging, overtakes rural oligarch/small-holder/farm worker cleavage, but large income inequalities (see figure 1 below) with 28% of the population living on less than $1 a day and significant percentages of urban residents living in favelas, overlapping with urban/rural and race distinctions continue to orient modern politics.

d.     Western hemisphere – dominant country within South America, but not yet defined place vis-à-vis North America, NAFTA – Free Trade Area of the Americas vs. Mercosur (created by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay in March 1991 with the goal of creating a common market).

e.      Economic dependency - Strong presence of multi-national corporations competes/collaborates with local private sector, causes some nationalist resentment

III. Legitimacy Crisis – product of partial modernization, corporatist tendencies, military intervention, populism, federalism

a.     Legitimacy Crises expressed in great variety of regime types:

a.      8 constitutions
b.     Monarchy since 1822
c.     Empire
d.     Republics since 1889
                  i.      First republican constitution – United States of Brazil, strongly liberal and federal – modeled on US example

   1.     Role of federal government

1.     Repel invasions through control of military/foreign affairs, maintain Republican form of regime, establish order at request of states, assure execution of federal laws, foreign trade/customs, imposition of a variety of taxes, issuance of money, separation of church and state

2.     Bicameral legislature (House of Deputies, Federal Senate)

3.     Separation of powers (no member of legislature part of executive)

4.     President of the Republic elected with Vice President (but no electoral college), has commander in chief function, etc.

5.     Supreme Court

6.     Electorate – at least 21, male, excludes illiterates (that’s most people), those within religious establishments not able to observe a free vote

2.     State governments – various taxing abilities (except on interstate commerce),

1.     Rural society remains dominated by landed elites who manipulated votes, violated spirit of Republican liberal values

    a.     Patron-client relations – clientelism, partimonialism (informal “machine” like operation of political system)

2.     Dominated by decentralization and power of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais

a.     European immigration and some urbanization challenges rural domination by 1920s

e.      1930 Revolution - Vargas takes power in midst of economic crisis, develops more centralized rule

                                                           i.      Undermines liberal concepts of civil society/state

                                                         ii.      State inspired industrialization – establishes public firms

                                                       iii.      State corporatism

1.     State sponsored associations for employers and employees (representational monopoly)

2.     State arbitrates conflicts

                                                       iv.      Estado Novo – new title for state corporatism

1.     Diminished role for representative, elected institutions

2.     Expanded welfare state

3.     Expanded professionalization, funding of military, public ownership of firms critical to national security

f.       1945-1964 Populist Republic

                                                           i.      New elections brought about new conflicts

1.     Those favoring clientelism and social control through a strong state (Social Democrats)

2.     Those favoring continued but leftist state corporatism  (Brazilian Labor Party)

3.     Those favoring liberal Republicanism and rejection of all corporatism except for economic development  (Democratic Union Party)

4.     Populist outcome

1.     PSD victory ensures social control in exchange for defined benefits to guarantee support (more welfare, labor favors)

2.     Kubitschek follows Vargas – Brazil enjoys strong economy until 1960, corruption decline thereafter

3.     Early 1960s, period of growing mobilization of social forces, ideological conflict, partisanship – inability to adjust political institutions

g.     1964-1985  Military government – bureaucratic authoritarianism – modernizing regime coupling military elites with technocrats in pursuit of order and economic development

1.     New party system erected by military (ARENA and MDB) reorders old party followers into new organizations

2.     Congress – easily circumvented by executive with strong power of using decrees

3.     Expansion of state sector leads to economic growth until 1973

4.     Economic troubles lead to abertura and growth of opposition MDB – regaining of liberal institutions/liberties

5.     1984 – new Presidential elections, 1987 Constituent Assembly redrafts constitution

h.     1988-present – Return to Democracy –

                                                           i.      1988 constitution which takes hold in 1988

1.     More decentralization

2.     More worker rights

3.     Independence of trade unions

4.     Retention of some public firms, exclusion of sectors from foreign investment and privatization


Article 170: “The economic order, founded on the appreciation of the value of human work and on free enterprise, is intended to ensure everyone a life with dignity, in accordance with the dictates of social justice, with due regard for the following principles

       I.            national sovereignty;

    II.            private property;

 III.            the social function of property;

IV.            free competition;

   V.            consumer protection;

VI.            environment protection;

VII.            reduction of regional and social differences;

VIII.            pursuit of full employment;

IX.            "preferential treatment for small enterprises organized under Brazilian laws and having their head-office and management in Brazil.


                                                         ii.      1989 – First direct election of President – Fernando Collor de Mello

1.     Starts reverse of statism – privatization, economic deregulation, open to external world – a Latin “Thatcher?”

2.     But inflation problem not solved, President impeached in 1992

3.     Replaced by I. Franco who with Fernando Cardoso implements “Real Plan” which curbs inflation

4.     Cardoso then wins Presidency in 1994 and 1998

5.     Rising state debt led to financial crisis

6.     Lula da Silva – Left wing populist elected in 2002  (more later)

IV. Penetration Crisis - State building and economic development

        a. Industrialization

1.     Export vs. import-substitution economic development

a.      Export

                                                                             i.      First based on agricultural exports

1.     coffee, sugar, cotton, rubber

2.     Through the early 1920s – brought in $ for infrastructure development, spin off industries

3.     1930s – Depression causes decline in foreign markets – less foreign currency for purchase imports

a.      Import-substitution results

                                                                                                                                                     i.      Phases, early focuses on low tech industries, sectors received some state subsidies, tariff protection

b.     1950s – move to more complex industries through state planning
        

                              i.      National development bank

                                                                                                                                                   ii.      National public firms

1.     subsidized prices in private sector

2.     lower credit costs made private firms more internationally competitive

3.     Planned benefits to targeted sectors sounds like French indicative planning

c.     1960s and 1980s – Contradictions of ISI emerge

                                                                                                                                                     i.      Protectionism – creates noncompetitive firms dependent on artificial subsidies

                                                                                                                                                   ii.      Cost of imported inputs covered by overvalued currency, which undermines exports

                                                                                                                                                 iii.      Lack of foreign currency prompts govt. to overload the money supply resulting in inflation

                                                                                                                                                 iv.      1970s – growth in foreign debt; foreign capital becomes more important

                                                                                                                                                   v.      Military govt. tries to cope by emphasizing efficiencies in agriculture for export

                                                                                                                                                 vi.      Environmental problems – cost of growth emphasis, weak regulatory impulse

1.     Water and air pollution

2.     Toxins in ground

3.     Deforestation due to mining, cattle, timber, slash and burn agriculture

4.     Efforts to deal with these problems start under military, expanded after 1985

5.     However, results have not been impressive

                                                                                                                                               vii.      Fiscal problems

1.     Tax avoidance is chronic

2.     Regressive tax policies

3.     informal economy stays outside taxable transactions (up to ½ of GDP)

4.     Local governments badly affected by excessive spending and lack oversight by fed govt.

5.     Cardoso tried to reign in state govts. but led to serious intergovernmental conflict

6.     Inflation – chronic problem

1.     Cardoso tried anchoring currency to US dollar

2.     Improved tax collection

3.     more foreign investment

4.     more stimulus to exports

5.     but excessive spending by govt. causes currency to devalue and inflation fears to continue


 

 

 

 



2.     Current economic situation – Brazil’s “Third Way?”

                                                                             i.      Lula da Silva – elected in October 2002

1.     Places great emphasis on overcoming social problems – poverty, hunger, joblessness

2.     Committed to free trade, foreign investment

3.     Committed to previous contracts

4.     Committed to fighting inflation

5.     What will he do that is different than predescessors?

                                                                                                                                                     i.       

 

 

 

 

 


 

b.     Principal trading partners (1998): exports to US (17.8%), Argentina (13.2%), Netherlands (5.4%), Japan (4.3%), Germany (5.9%), UK (2.1%). [EU (27%)]

c.     Principal trading partners (1998): imports from US (22.2%), Argentina (13.2%), Germany (8.6%), Japan (5.3%), Italy (5.2%), [EU (26.7%)]

V. Distribution Crisis – Brazil’s welfare state

A. Ineffective welfare state

a.      High cost, but insufficient coverage

b.     Only 15% of workers are eligible for most social benefits, those in the informal sectors are excluded

c.     Many don’t contribute taxes to welfare system

d.     Many retirees reduce revenues

e.      Public sector workers are disproportionately benefited

f.       Federal govt. decentralizing social services to states resulting in disparate outcomes

     B. Lingering problems

1.     High unemployment

2.     Inequalities – highly skewed income distribution – Brazil at “60” vs. Latin America average of 50.
Average og Gini coefficients by region, 1960s-1990s


Average per capita income growth and distribution of labor...

Figure 2: Income Tables (source: World Bank)

3.     Corruption – makes it hard to effectively administer services and programs

4.     Rural land tenure with high concentration of land ownership

5.     Rural to urban migration without adequate housing or employment

6.     Regional inequalities

7.     Very high cost of maintaining “universal” access to welfare benefits

1.     Reforms strongly resisted – element of continuing instability

C. Questions – has Brazil found its “Third Way?”

a.      Cardoso (first as Minister of Finance and then as President) had started with a “Thatcher” like series of reforms: free market reforms, privatization, reduced govt. spending (austerity), more efficient tax collection, a more stable currency.

b.     Lula da Silva (like Blair) promises to retain and deepen these initiatives, but also focus on improving the lot of the poor.


Brazil Part 2 -  Political Institutions 

 

Main Institutions 

 

 

President - head of state, head of government, commander-in-chief
  Directly elected in two round election (primary, general), four year terms, 2 term maximum

    President is focus of policy making.  Executive bureaucracy takes major role in setting forth major policies, based on leadership both of President as well as other central usually economic Ministers and Directors.  President appoints 100s of senior government officials.  Has a "Government Council" (Cabinet) run by chief of staff. 

Some important institutions within executive branch that affect economic policy making include the Finance Ministry, Central Bank, the Department of Planning, and the BNDES (development bank)  Legislature is left to work on the details.

    Civil Service - runs under the executive branch.  Professionalized but tends to have clientelist characteristics as well - with individual stakeholders included in policy-making and specific concessions made in exchange for political support.  These are called bureaucratic rings.  These rings sometimes involve organized interest groups such as business associations or trade unions, but often are personalistic and relate to specific individuals.  Note that the election of Lula da Silva and the rise of the Workers' Party, which has strong ties to the trade union movement (CUT) may change the historical pattern of interest group/executive branch interaction.

    Military -  now more professionalized, less political focus.  Has seen reductions in budget, privatization of military owned "industrial-defense" firms. 

    Police - split into "civil" (investigatory) and "military" which is more concerned with daily law and order.  Known for violence and being hard to control.

Legislature - two chambers: Chamber of Deputies (513, based on population) and Senate (81,based on territory - 26 States plus "Federal District")

Justice - led by Supreme Federal Court - which has limited constitutional oversight duties as well as being the final court of appeal. 11 Justices appointed by President with affirmation of Senate.  Lifetime appointment.  Court has often lacked assertiveness as a "check and balance" typically allowing the Executive to get away with marginal calls.

State/Local courts known to be influenced by local power structures, particularly in rural areas where landowners are still dominant social force.

Federalism - States led by elected governors (4 year terms, 2 term maximum)

Since 1980s, increasing decentralization, with greater local taxing authority.  State banks have financed local projects, but have run up big debts, usually passed on to the federal level.  President Collor cut back on this.  He also increased requirements for local funding of education, social services and projects.

 

Representation

60% of population able to vote by 1994 (still excludes illiterates).  Minimum voting age: 16.  Voting compulsory starting at age 18.

Chamber of Deputies

4 year terms

Proportional representation within each state: min. 8 deputies, maximum 70.  No term limits, high turnover. Overrepresents rural areas. 

Senate

3 from each state+federal district. 8 year terms.  2/3 elected one cycle, 1/3 elected next cycle. No term limits, but lots of turnover.

Bill passage

Legislation has to pass both houses. President can sign or reject in whole or in part.  Legislature can override President by majority vote of joint session.

Senate can impeach President and affirm appointments.

Each chamber has a committee structure, 16 committees.

Party System

Parties historical weak, low party discipline, without durable party labels/organizations.  Personal loyalities and patronage/career advancement have been more important.  Reinforced by proportional representation and tendency of President to offer specific "pork" to individual legislators as price of bill passage.

Basic ideological tendencies:

Right: PFL (and smaller parties) neo-liberal - wants smaller government, privatization, liberal trade policy (except for some protectionism), wants reduction in "social rights" and end to proportional representation.

Center - PMDB, PSDB - mostly interested in economic stabilization, deficit reduction, low inflation, steady growth.  Mixed economy with some welfare state.

Left - PT (plus lots of smaller left parties) - want more government support to domestic industry, increase in "social rights," less inequality and more help to working classes.

Chart of 1999, 2002 Elections - Chamber of Deputies Results

2002 Presidential Election Second Round Results

Candidate   Votes %
Luis Inácio "Lula" da Silva (PT)   52,793,364 61.27
José Serra (PSDB)   33,370,739 38.73
       
2002 Presidential Election First Round Results  
Candidate Votes % Party
Luis Inácio "Lula" da Silva (PT) 39,443,765 46.44 PT
José Serra (PSDB) 19,700,395 23.20 PSDB
Anthony Garotinho (PSB) 15,175,729 17.87 PSB
Ciro Gomes (PPS) 10,167,597 11.97 PPS
Others 440,648 0.52  
Total Votes 84,928,134 100.00  
Chamber of Deputies  1999   2002   
Party Before % After %
Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB)* 87 17.0 74 14.4 -2.6
Liberal Front Party (PFL)* 98 19.1 85 16.6 -2.5
Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB)* 94 18.3 71 13.8 -4.5
Workers' Party (PT)** 58 11.3 91 17.7 +6.4
Progressive Party (PPB)* 53 10.3 48 9.4 -1.1
Democratic Labour Party (PDT)** 16 3.1 21 4.1 +1.0
Brazilian Labour Party (PTB)** 33 6.4 26 5.1 -1.3
Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB)/PC do B** 16 3.1 22 4.3 +1.2
Brazilian Comunist Party (PC do B)** 10 1.9 12 2.3 +.4
Liberal Party (PL)/Social Liberal Party (PSL)** 27 5.3 27 5.3 0
Popular Socialist Party (PPS)** 12 2.3 15 2.9 +.6
Others 9 1.8 21 4.1 +2.3
Total 513 100.0 513 100.0
Right 98      
Center 94      
 Left  98      
Senate        
Party Before % After %
Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB)* 24 29.6 19 23.5 -6.1
Liberal Front Party (PFL)* 17 21.0 19 23.5 +2.5
Workers' Party (PT)** 8 9.9 14 17.3 +7.4
Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB)* 14 17.3 11 13.6 -3.7
Democratic Labour Party (PDT)** 5 6.2 5 6.2 0
Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB)** 3 3.7 4 4.9 +1.2
Brazilian Labour Party (PTB)* 5 6.2 3 3.7 -2.5
Liberal Party (PL)** 1 1.2 3 3.7 +2.5
Popular Socialist Party (PPS)** 2 2.5 1 1.2 -1.3
Progressive Party (PPB)* 2 2.5 1 1.2 -1.3
Social Democratic Party (PSD) 0 0.0 1 1.2 +1.2
Total 81 100.0 81 100.0
*   Allies        
**  Allies        
 
 
Summary of the 1 October and 29 October 2006 Brazil presidential election results
Candidates Votes % 1st round Votes % 2nd round
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT, PC do B, PRB, PL, PSB, PP) 46,662,365 48.61 58,295,042 60.83
Geraldo Alckmin (PSDB, PFL, PPS) 39,968,369 41.64 37,543,178 39.17
Heloísa Helena (P-SOL, PSTU, PCB) 6,575,393 6.85 - -
Cristovam Buarque (PDT) 2,538,844 2.64 - -
Ana Maria Rangel (PRP) 126,404 0.13 - -
José Maria Eymael (PSDC) 63,294 0.07 - -
Luciano Bivar (PSL) 62,064 0.06 - -
Total (turnout 83.2 and ) 95,996,733 100.00 95,838,220 100.00
Notes: party of the candidate, supporting parties, unofficial supporting parties
Source: Justiça Eleitoral
Summary of the 1 October 2006 National Congress of Brazil election results
Parties Chamber of Deputies Federal Senate
Votes % Seats Votes % Total seats elected in 2006
Workers' Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores) 13,989,859 15.0 83 16,222,159 19.2 11 2
Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro) 13,580,517 14.6 89 10,148,024 12.0 15 4
Brazilian Social Democracy Party (Partido da Social-Democracia Brasileira) 12,691,043 13.6 65 10,547,778 12.5 15 5
Liberal Front Party (Partido da Frente Liberal) 10,182,308 10.9 65 21,653,812 25.7 18 6
Progressive Party (Partido Progresista) 6,662,309 7.1 42 4,228,431 5.0 1 1
Brazilian Socialist Party (Partido Socialista Brasileiro) 5,732,464 6.2 27 2,143,355 2.5 3 1
Democratic Labour Party (Partido Democrático Trabalhista) 4,854,017 5.2 24 5,023,041 6.0 5 1
Brazilian Labour Party (Partido Trabalhista Brasileiro) 4,397,743 4.7 22 2,676,469 3.2 4 3
Liberal Party (Partido Liberal) 4,074,618 4.4 23 696,501 0.8 3 1
Socialist People's Party (Partido Popular Socialista) 3,630,462 3.9 21 1,232,571 1.5 1 1
Green Party (Partido Verde) 3,368,561 3.6 13 1,425,765 1.7 0 0
Communist Party of Brazil (Partido Comunista do Brasil) 1,982,323 2.1 13 6,364,019 7.5 2 1
Christian Social Party (Partido Social Cristão) 1,747,863 1.9 9 131,548 0.2 0 0
Socialism and Freedom Party (Partido Socialismo e Libertade) 1,149,619 1.2 3 351,527 0.4 0 0
Party of the Reconstruction of the National Order (Partido de Reedificação da Ordem Nacional) 907,494 1.0 2 69,640 0.1 0 0
Party of National Mobilization (Partido da Mobilização Nacional) 875,686 0.9 3 12,925 0.0 0 0
Christian Labour Party (Partido Trabalhista Cristão) 806,662 0.9 4 39,690 0.0 0 0
Humanist Party of Solidarity (Partido Humanista da Solidariedade) 435,328 0.5 2 24,940 0.0 0 0
Christian Social Democratic Party (Partido Social Democrata Cristão) 354,217 0.4 0 53,025 0.1 0 0
Labour Party of Brazil (Partido Trabalhista do Brasil) 311,833 0.3 1 69,923 0.1 0 0
Party of the Nation's Retirees (Partido dos Aposentados da Nação) 264,682 0.3 1 2,969 0.0 0 0
Brazilian Republican Party (Partido Republicano Brasileiro) 244,059 0.3 1 264,155 0.3 2 0
Republican Progressive Party (Partido Republicano Progresista) 233,497 0.3 0 12,954 0.0 0 0
Social Liberal Party (Partido Social Liberal) 190,793 0.2 0 46,542 0.0 0 0
Brazilian Labour Renewal Party (Partido Renovador Trabalhista Brasileiro) 171,908 0.2 0 644,111 0.8 1 1
National Labour Party (Partido Trabalhista) 149,809 0.2 0 11,063 0.0 0 0
United Socialist Workers' Party (Partido Socialista dos Trabalhadores Unificado) 101,307 0.1 0 196,636 0.2 0 0
Brazilian Communist Party (Partido Comunista Brasileiro) 64,766 0.1 0 62,756 0.1 0 0
Workers Cause Party (Partido da Causa Operária) 29,083 0.0 0 27,476 0.0 0 0
Total (turnout 83.3) 93,184,830 100 513 84,383,805 100 81 27

 

Parties

The Brazilian Congress is an amalgam of many different parties, most tiny and weak, ranging from hard core communists to right-wing fundamentalist Christians.  Politicians frequently switch parties and, as a result, the proportion of congressional seats held by a particular party may change during a congressional term.

The Brazilian Social Democratic Party (PSDB, Partido da Social Democracia Brasileiro)

Founded in 1988, president Cardoso's center-left Social Democratic PSDB advertises itself as a social democratic alternative for Brazil.  It advocates a mixed economy in which the government continues to play a strategic role.

The
Liberal Front Party (PFL, Partido da Frente Liberal)

The center-right PFL was founded in 1984 and is a principal Cardoso ally.  The party is considered the most coherent force of the Brazilian political landscape.  Furthermore, the PFL is professionally organized, dominated by old-style political bosses and well represented on the national, state and municipal levels.

Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB, Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro)

Founded in 1980, the centrist PMDB is the largest Brazilian party and is considered to lack coherent leadership.  The party has supported president Cardoso on key legislative initiatives but often at a large porkbarrel cost.

The Workers
Party (PT, Partido dos Trabalhadores)

The PT is the main opposition party headed by party founder Luis Inacio "Lula" da Silva.  The party was originally based on the emerging power of the new unionism that reflected Brazil's impressive industrial growth after 1964.  Founded in 1980, the left-wing PT, which garners support from the impoverished middle class, espouses an economic model of state-led development and has adopted a firm anti-corruption agenda. 
 

Essential Links:
Partido da Social Democracia Brasileira (PSDB)        Economic Review of Brazil

Partido da Frente Liberal (PFL)

Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro (PMDB)

Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT)